Tyler Robinson’s court hearing took a strange turn Friday when a Utah judge barred a media videographer from filming Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin in the courtroom over lip-reading concerns raised by the defense.

Utah District Judge Tony Graf prohibited the pool cameraman from filming or photographing the 22-year-old murder suspect, warning close-up footage of him could prejudice the remainder of the hearing.

“During the remainder of this hearing, the camera shall not photograph Mr. Robinson at all,” Graf ruled.

Tyler Robinson’s court hearing took a bizarre turn when a Utah judge barred cameras from filming the alleged Charlie Kirk assassin.AP

“That will be the sanction of this court. I will allow the pool camera operator to reposition the camera to adhere to that.”

The decision came after Robinson’s attorneys brought up their concerns with Graf, arguing the videographer zoomed in on their client, capturing their conversation, ABC 4 reported.

Robinson’s counsel showed the judge two clips of previous footage they said violated court rules.

Graf said the court could have held the videographer in contempt and fined them, but opted not to do so.

The 𝒹𝓇𝒶𝓂𝒶 unfolded during the hearing in which Robinson’s defense attorneys were working to boot Utah County prosecutors from the high-profile case over an alleged conflict of interest.

“The Utah County Attorneys have advised us that a family member of one of the attorneys was present at the incident at which Mr. Kirk was shot and killed,” defense attorney Richard Novak told Graf during an October hearing.

The defense team argued they were informed by prosecutors the relative – a student — “was within 85 feet” of the 31-year-old Turning Point USA founder when he was shot dead at Utah Valley University while speaking to a crowd of thousands as part of his American Comeback Tour on Sept. 10.

Utah District Judge Tony Graf prohibited media outlets from filming Robinson over lip-reading concerns.AP

The defense added the prosecutor’s daughter was forced to “flee” the campus with police that were “deployed to the area with her safety and status in mind,’ adding that “the Utah County Attorney’s Office was all advised of this,” Novak said.

There are six prosecutors on Robinson’s case and the name of the prosecutor in question was redacted in court papers.

Prosecutors argued that there is no conflict of interest, explaining the relative, who had a “comparatively minor emotional reaction” to the killing, will be among thousands of witnesses called to testify at trial, the outlet reported.The defense requested that their motion to dismiss be referred to the Utah Attorney General’s Office — but Graf moved to hold an evidentiary hearing instead to rule on the matter.

The judge has not yet ruled on the issue.

Robinson is facing seven felony charges of aggravated murder, discharge of a firearm causing serious bodily injury, obstruction of justice, two counts of witness tampering and commission of a violent offense in the presence of a child.

He remains behind bars pending trial and could face death by firing squad if convicted.

Utah is one of five states that still allow the unusual execution method of carrying out capital punishment.